← All articles
Comparison

Speechmark vs Granola: which keeps your meeting notes private?

Granola is, deservedly, one of the most-loved meeting-notes apps on the Mac. It doesn't send a bot into your call, it transcribes on your device, and its core trick — quietly upgrading the rough notes you type into a clean write-up — is genuinely good. So comparing it to Speechmark isn't the usual "private app vs cloud recorder" story. Both are Mac-first, both skip the bot, both transcribe locally.

The honest differences are narrower and more specific: where your notes end up, whether your conversations are used to train an AI, and whether you rent the tool or own it. We make Speechmark, so we have a side — but everything below is factual, and we'll point out where Granola is the better pick.

What Granola and Speechmark agree on

Credit where it's due. On a few things people care about, the two are aligned:

  • No meeting bot. Both capture audio directly from your Mac. Nothing joins the call; no recording bot appears in the participant list.
  • On-device transcription. Both transcribe locally rather than streaming your audio to a server to be turned into text.
  • Mac-native. Both are real Mac apps, not a web tab.

If "no bot in my meeting" is your only requirement, either tool clears the bar. The difference is what happens to the words after they're transcribed.

The real difference: where your notes live

Granola transcribes on-device and then discards the audio file — a good policy. But the transcript and the notes are synced to Granola's cloud and tied to your account. That's by design: it's what powers cross-device sync, shared Spaces, and asking questions across your meeting history. Your meeting content lives on Granola's servers.

Speechmark keeps the whole thing on your Mac. There's no account and no server — the transcript, the summary, and the original recording stay on the device as local files. Nobody else holds a copy, because there's nowhere else for it to go.

For privileged, regulated, or simply confidential conversations, "the audio is discarded but the transcript is in our cloud" and "nothing leaves the machine" are very different commitments.

Your conversations and AI training

This is the difference most people miss. By default, Granola uses meeting data to help train its AI models. There's an individual opt-out in settings, but an organization-wide opt-out is reserved for its top Enterprise plan.

Speechmark never uses your meetings to train anything. When you want an AI summary you pick the model: Apple's on-device foundation models or a local Ollama model (nothing leaves the Mac at all), or your own OpenAI / Anthropic key — in which case only the transcript text goes to the provider you chose, under your account's terms, never to us.

Pricing: subscription vs one-time

Granola is a subscription. There's a capable free tier, with paid plans (roughly $14–$35 per user per month at the time of writing) unlocking unlimited history, integrations, and team features. Access to the full product depends on keeping the plan active.

Speechmark is a one-time purchase of $79 per Mac — no subscription. Buy it once, own it. Over any meaningful stretch of time, a one-time license costs less than a per-seat monthly fee; a subscription only wins if you need notes for a month or two.

Side by side

Granola Speechmark
Meeting bot No (captures device audio) No (captures device audio)
Transcription On-device On-device
Audio Discarded after transcription Stays on your Mac
Where notes live Granola's cloud (synced to account) Your Mac only
Account required Yes No
Trains AI on your meetings By default (opt-out; org-wide opt-out on Enterprise) Never
AI model Granola's cloud Apple / Ollama on-device, or your own key (BYOK)
Pricing Subscription, ~$14–$35/user/mo (free tier) One-time, $79/Mac
Export & ownership In-app / cloud Markdown, JSON, SQLite (local files)
Platforms Mac, Windows, iOS macOS 14.2+ (Apple silicon)
Team Spaces & sharing Strong Not the focus

Where Granola is the better choice

We'd rather you pick the right tool. Granola is the better fit if:

  • You love the augmented-notes workflow — typing rough notes during the call and having AI clean them up is Granola's signature strength, and it's excellent at it.
  • You need cross-platform — Granola runs on Mac, Windows, and iOS; Speechmark is Mac-only.
  • Your team wants shared workspaces: Spaces, sharing, meeting chat across a workspace, and integrations.
  • You want a generous free tier to start with, backed by a large, well-funded team.

Speechmark isn't trying to be a collaboration platform. It's a focused, private, single-purpose Mac app.

Where Speechmark wins

Choose Speechmark if:

  • You want your notes and transcript to stay on your Mac — no account, nothing synced to a vendor's cloud.
  • You don't want your conversations used to train anyone's AI, on any plan.
  • You'd rather pay once than subscribe per seat.
  • You want notes in open, local formats (Markdown, JSON, SQLite) that you fully own and can back up or grep yourself.
  • You want to point Claude Desktop at your meetings through a one-click local connector — answering questions grounded in notes that never left your device.

The bottom line

Granola is a polished, well-loved product, and it's more thoughtful about privacy than the typical cloud recorder — no bot, on-device transcription, audio discarded. But your notes still live in its cloud, and your meetings help train its models unless you change a setting (or pay for the Enterprise plan to do it for a whole team). Speechmark makes the stricter trade: everything stays on your Mac, nothing trains a model, and you pay once. If ownership and privacy are what you're optimizing for, that's the line between them.

If you're also weighing a cloud recorder, see Speechmark vs Otter.ai.

See how Speechmark works → · Pricing →